\
QH359
.E76
5*06 (73) Ha
EVOLUTION
1-h 1927-38
AMNH LIBRARY
100115223
FOR THE PEOPLE
FOR EDVCATION
FOR SCIENCE
LIBRARY
OF
THE AMERICAN MUSEUM
OF
NATURAL HISTORY
A N '35n3DjA9 ^^^
HSONIflliinW
Vol. II. No. 5
AUGUST, 1923
€C)i(lijh.
10 Cents
EUOCUnON
Entered as second class matter at New V ork, N. \ ., Jan. 7, 1928. Evolution Pnbli.shing Corporation. 96 5th Ave., N. Y.
"Logical consequences are the scarecrows of fools and the
beacons of wise men. The only question which any wise man
can ask himself, and w^hich any honest man will ask himself,
is whether a doctrine is true or false."
TnoM.x.s H. HuxLEV
r.v.i: Two
E V O L U T I O N
August, 1929
The Life Story of An Eel
Bx PAL'LIXE H. DEDERER
'T'HE most famous person undoubtedly to inquire
into the family antecedents of the eel was Aristotle,
who left a record of his opinion that eels have no sexes
or eggs, and that they arise from the entrails of the
sea. Later speculation.'^, less negative, but no nearer
the irutli, derived them from snakes, worms, or beetles,
and — the latest suggestion, emanating from New Eng-
laiul- vven frcm clam.',.
Why should it
be so difficult to
get the facts re-
garding the de-
velopment of
these bizarre
fishes? Anyone
who has visited
a fish hatchery
has probably
seen tnousands
of tiny trout de-
veloping from
eggs laid and
fertilized in the
waters of the
hatchery. B u t
only four years
ago did anyone
ever see the egg
of an eel, and
only one person has ever studied its development.
Now the matter is simplicity itself. All anyone need
do is to join a deep-sea exploring expedition, embark-
on a yacht equipped with the last word in scientific
apparatus, and proceed to a region of the Atbrntic
(Jcean southwest of Bermuda — the famed Sargasso
Sea where, in 1925, William Beebe and his company
of scientists reveled in their "Arcturus Adventure."
Then you may watch the nets go down and scooo up
quantities of the surface life of the sea, or planktfju.
In this oozy "sea soup" may be found the larvae of
eels, varying in size from a quarter of an inch to tiiree
inches in length, thin as a willow leaf, and of about
the same shape. Dr. Beebe described them as "mother-
of-pearl eyes swimming round by themselves," the
body being perfectly transparent. The finding of the
larvae was not a new discovery, for Dr. Jobs. Schmidt
of Denmark had worked out the astounding migration
path of the larvae and their metamorphosis into eels,
publishing his results just before the Arcturus Ex-
pedition set out. But neither he nor anyone else knew
what the larvae came froin.
To unravel this mystery, ask the expert on larval
fishes for a microscope and one of those pin-head dots
Development of eel: At first it shrinks
in size, then assumes adult shape and
starts to grow
of living stuff dredged up from the sea depths, which
are engaging her attention. Then, after a few days of
more or less constant study — and let us hope the ship
is not pitching too much — you may observe, as did
Marie Poland Fish, the tiny dot actually transform
into a larval eel. This discovery shows the importance
of being in the right .place at the right time. The right
place — and the only place — to answer this question
about eels, is in mid-Atlantic, the only region where
our eels breed. Thus with a few accessories, like
niiscroscopes, a ship, patience, scientific training, and
immunity from mal-de-mer, the question that perplexed
Aristotle is answered. Simple enough !
Now the whole story is known. American and Euro-
pean eels have the same breeding ground, the sea near
Bermuda. The larvae drift northward in the currents
of the Gulf Stream, changing from leaf-like creatures
into small rounded eels, or elvers. The American
species seek the various rivers along the eastern shore
of the United States, and swarm up-stream in great
numbers, even wriggling over grass on rainy nights to
reach the land-locked pKjnds in which they mature. In
the fall of the year, the adult eels migrate from inland
waters to the sea, traveling months before they reach
the Atlantic breeding grounds, there to begin anew the
cycle of development, and to die immediately after
spawning.
European eels, migrating northward in the same
ocean currents, take three years instead of one to meta-
morphose. They are therefore not ready to ascend
ri\ers when they near our shores and are carried on
north-easterly until they reach the shores of Europe.
Phere, as elvers, they ascend the streams and rivers.
Dr. Schmidt, in his report on The Breeding Places of
the Eel, states that eels have been taken in waters in
Switzerland at an altitude of 3,000 feet above the sea.
He points out that although extensive migrations of
fish are not unusual, the eels are really related to salt-
water fishes, and "the remarkable point in their life
history is not so much the fact of their migration out
to sea to spawn, as in their leaving it in order to pass
their period of growth in an environment so unusual
for muraenoid fishes as fresh water."
The basis for the idea that eels arise from clams, al-
ready referred to, is probably the observation that
clams often have a transparent gelatinous rod, about
one inch and a half long, protruding from a break in
their tissues. This rod is eel-like in form and size, and
like the undeveloped eel is also transparent. It is a «
secretion from the stomach of the clam called the
crystalline style. Its function was not definitely known
until Dr. Thurlow Nelson of Rutgers University in
1925 explained its importance in aiding to separate
the food materials from sand in the digestive tract of
the clam.
August. 1929
E\-OLUTION
Page Three
The Super-Men of Cro-Magnon
By EDWARD GRIEG CLEMMER
Cro-Magnon Man, as restored by
J. H. McGregor
T^HE rock shelter of Cro-Magnon is in the French
village of Les Ej-zies, in the Dordogne Valley.
Here, in 1868, were discovered the first skeletons of
Cro - Magnon Man.
Many other finds
since then make our
knowledge of this an-
cient race of Cro-
Magnon very com-
plete.
The Cro-Magnons
lived in the Upper
Paleolithic age, ahout
25,000 to 10^000 B.C.
This age is divided
into three periods,
named, in ascending
order, the Aurigna-
cian, Solutrean and
Magdalenian, after the
towns of Aurignac,
Solutre and La Ma-
deleine where the
first type tools were found. For each period is dis-
tinguished by a different kind of tools, the type tools
of one period not carrying over into the next, although
the same basic design, may be preserved.
The Cro-Magnons were fine physical specimens,
some skeletons indicating a height of six feet, four
inches. The race as a whole was taller than the aver-
age modern European and far taller than the Neander-
thal race. Also, the Cro-Magnon walked fully erect
and held his head high. His brain equalled or excelled
ours in cubical contents. Some have suggested that he
might have been a mutation from the Neanderthal, but
it is probable that he evolved in Asia and immigrated
to the land of the Neanderthal.
In almost every case, the skeletons show care m
burial, and at some stations the body was placed in a
particular position, surrounded by shells or tools.
Sometimes the grave had been filled with a special
earlh. and one skeleton had been painted red. All this
indicates that this people considered burial an impor-
tant ceremony, and they probably had a belief in an
after-life. Certainly they valued the remains of their
dead more than had any preceding race.
During the first or Aurignacian period, the cleaver,
point and scraper were replaced by improved tools
shaped from blade-like flint flakes from which small
chips were removed by pressing instead of striking.
In tb's manner, Aurignacian man made knives with an
evident handle and sharply pointed gravers for carving
on bones and on cave walls. He also made bone and
ivory points, cleft at the liase for the end of his javelin.
In the Solutrean period the art of flint working by
pressure flaking reached its highest development. The
most characteristic and beautiful tools were the laurel
leaf and willow leaf points, the former two inches to
a foot long, symmetrical, evenly flaked, straight, shar])
and thin, the latter even more delicate and slender.
But all this marvelous dexterity eventually came to
naught, for the Magdalenians who followed paid little
attention to flint implements. They did use flint drills,
saws, gravers and scratchers, but they made real prog-
ress in transforming reindeer horn and bones into
javelin points, needles, awls, fishhooks, harpoons and
dart throwers.
Where the Magdalenians did excel was in their art,
figures carved from ivory and stone, probably of magi-
cal significance, perhaps worshipped as idols, and on
the walls of their caves, drawings and paintings. In
1878, Marquis Santyola, accompanied by his little
daughter, was searching the cavern of Altamira, Spain,
for relics of ancient man. Suddenly she cried out,
Painting of Bison in colors. Cavern of Altamira, Spain
"Toros! Toros! (Bulls! Bulls!)", and pointed ex-
citedly to the ceiling of the cavern, all covered with the
frescoes drawn by Magdalenian man. Subsequently
other caves were discovered in France and Spain, their
ceilings and walls similarly covered with drawings,
some just outlines, others filled in with bright colors
that have not faded to this day.
What happened to Cro-Magnon man we do not
know. We do know that he lived in the cold
of the Ice Age, and that when the ice melted away to
the North, the animals he hunted for food left for
colder regions. Some think he followed them and that
the Eskimos are his descendants. Their culture is much
like his, but their physical characteristics are very dif-
ferent. Probably this prehistoric race of artists just
died out. Or the warm weather made life too easy so
they degenerated and became the easy victims of more
vigorous invaders from Asia or the Mediterranean
region. Others, however, think that Cro-Magnon blood
still courses through the veins of some Europeans, but
of that we can only guess.
Page Four
EVOLUTION
August, 1929
Brains — How Come?
By ALLAN STRONG BROMS
VIII
A PE became Man when he learned to talk. For taFk
gave him thought. No overnight matter, that. It
took a million years. For there's a lot behind it ; new
brain centers, new muscular control, an understanding
ear, a wise eye, man's organization of mind.
Our ape ancestors probably had the essential physi-
cal equipment, such as vocal cords and muscles, tongue
and all the rest, without having learned to use them
in real talk. At least not in wordy talk
about ideas. They had plenty of feel-
ings, but mighty few ideas. So their
first talk was about feelings. With
voice of course, but quite as much by
grimace and gesture. Crooning ten-
derness, love's sweet nothings, chatter-
ing' excitement, screaming anger, bel-
lowing defiance, wailing sorrow, whim-
pering hunger, all without words.
The first real words were warning
cries, and soon, commands to do or not
to do. Primitive equivalents of our
'T-ook out!" "Beat it!" "Stop, Look
and Listen," "Come and get it." Next
they probably named each other and
the common things of their lives, and
told each other what to do about
those things. Very simply, of course.
It took a long time before they made
up honest-to-goodness sentences, full
of "ands, ifs, huts, and hences," de-
scriptive adjectives, modifying ad-
verbs, and all the what-nots of our
expressive languages. Such intricate
inventions came only as the speech
centers of man's brain developed.
Significantly enough, those speech centers are bet-
ter developed on one side of his brain. Usually the left
side, to go with his normal right-handedness (also
under left-brain control). Speech always was mixed
up with gestures, and we still talk a lot with our hands.
Ouite naturally, therefore, the speech centers developed
more on the left side of the brain. And it probably
helped; that man. for the last few thousand years at
least, has been picturing his ideas and writing his talk
(again mostly with his skilled right hand). Inevitably,
too, the related higher speech centers for understand-
ing the meanings of words heard, of words seen,
located themselves largely nearby on the same talk-side.
Belonging together, the various ways of acquiring
and expressing meanings became mentally tied together.
Things seen, pictures drawn, names heard and spoken,
words written, all used together, were kept together in
the brain. But not in one brain center. For already
each sense and muscle had its own established brain
center, and each stayed put, but took its share in the
Language Centers in Man's Brain
.\fter Brcuil
After .Janifs
complicated job of talking. Complicated, and more
complicated ! For towards the end, man made a great
nivention, a new set of pictures, the letters of the
alphal)et. Symbols these, just meaning sounds, talking
I)ictures. Man spells them together into words, writ-
ten as they sound, spoken as written. Handy and last-
ing. But what a job for his brain ! Old brain centers
made over, new ones developed, all kept working to-
gether by long-distance nerve connec-
tions.
But look what it means to man.
Without words he could not think, not
like a modern. For man thinks with
words. Thought is just silent talking.
Childreh think a lot out loud. So do
people who live much alone. So do
we, muttering thoughts, making lip
movements.
Now words can mean one thing,
or a group of like things, or the like-
ness between them, or doings to them.
They can mean real stuff, or general
qualities, or doings done, and even
nothing at all. For one can acquire
words with meanings, or empty ones
without meanings, beyond sound and
spelling. If they mean real things to
Us. they serve as a mental shorthand
fur truthful and workable thinking.
But if they are empty words, just
habits of utterance which we rever-
ence and mouth, they do sad things to
our thinking, or what passes for think-
ing. They may satisfy our minds,
and sound like the wisdom of the
ages, but they will trick us into mere
zcordiiii/. Then we just think we think.
Real thinking is also wording, l.nit a different kind.
1 he words have real contents of meaning. They mean
real things, real qualities of things, real likenesses
between things, real ideas. Because they serve us as
mental shorthand, we could never have attained to
Iiiiiuan thinking at all had we not found words to think
with. If we watch our words, avoid making them
empty sounds, we can keep them useful. The best way
is to keep our contacts with fact, through scientific
ex]ieriment and observation, through practical arts.
Only in these worlds of fact can we keep our words full
of true meanings. Words like that keep our thinking
straight to guide our doing. For truth works.
That, in fact, is the test of truth — it works. Try it
on your own ideas. Give your wordings the once over.
Words were the making of man. With speech he
passed his ideas around, traded them for a lot more
others. But ideas spread by word of mouth are easily
twisted, or even lost. Writing solved that problem.
August. 1929
EVOLUTION
Page Five
Written words could be kept strai,i;ht, kejit tor future
generations. Knowledge began to accumulate. Each
generation started where the last one left off. Printing
helped too. Knowledge could be spread, all over the
world, to scholar and layman. With knowledge popu-
larized, nearl}- evervone was thinking. Bright minds
got their starts, emerged to discover and invent, to help
lift mankind higher. So the rate of progress increased.
More thinking men and women on the job. More tested
knowledge to work with. The result — man making his
world lietter, making life happier. It sounds strange,
l:ut he talked himself into it.
When Birds Had Teeth
Bv FREDERIC A. LUCAS
C EPARATED b}- millions of years from that
earliest of all known birds, the toothed Archaeop-
teryx of the Jurassic period (described last month),
the next birds that we know come from the chalk beds
of western Kansas. Time enough had passed for mem-
bers of one group to have quite lost their wings, yet
they still retained teeth, the most bird-like of them be-
ing quite unlike any modern bird in this respeci. The
first specimens were obtained by Professor Marsh in
his expeditions of 1870 and 1871, but not until a few-
years later, after the material had been cleaned and
was being studied, was it ascertained that these birds
were armed with teeth. The smaller of these birds was
not unlike a small gull and was, saving its teeth, so
thoroughly a bird that it may be passed by without
further notice. The larger, however, was remarkable
Draw inii lj>- (ileeson
The Toothed Diver. Hesperornis Regalis
in many ways. Hesperornis was a great diver, in some
ways the greatest of the divers, slender and graceful
in general build, looking somewhat like an overgrown,
absolutely wingless loon.
The penguins, as everyone knows, swim with their
front limbs — we can't call them wings — which, though
containing all the hones of a wing, have become trans-
formed into powerful paddles. Hesperornis, on the
other hand, swam altogether with its legs — swam so
well with them, indeed, that through natural selection
the disused wings dwindled away and vanished, save
one bone. Hesperornis was large, upwards of five feet
long, and if its ancestors were equally bulky, their
wings were c|uite too big for swimming under water as
do the short-winged Auks which fly under water quite
as they fly over it. Hence the big wings were closelv
fiildud upon the body to off'er tlr* least possible resi-t-
ance, and it was advantageous that th>jy and their
muscles dwindled, while the bones and muscles of the
legs increased by constant use. By the time the wings
were small enough to be used in so dense a medium as
water, the muscles had become too feeble to move
them, and so degeneration proceeded until but one bone
remained, a mere vestige. The penguins retain their
great breast muscles, as did the Great Auk, since it
takes even more strength to move a small wing in
water than a large wing in the thinner air.
As a swimming bird, one that swims with its legs
and not with its wings, Hesperornis has probably never
been equalled, for the size and appearance of the bones
indicate great power, while the bones of the foot were
so joined to those of the leg as to turn edgewise as the
foot was brought forward, thus offering less resistance
to the water. It is remarkable that these leg bones are
hollow, because as a rule the bones of aquatic animals
are more or less solid, their weight being supported
by the water; liut those of the great diver were almost
as light as if it had dwelt on dry land. That it did not
dwell there is conclusively shown by its feet.
The most extraordinary thing about Hesperornis is
the position of the legs relative to the body, and this is
something that was not even suspected until the skele-
ton was mounted in a swimming attitude. As anyone
knows who has watched a duck swim, the usual place
for the feet and legs is beneath and in line with the
body. But in our great extinct diver, the joints of the
leg bones are such that this was impossible, and the
feet and lower legs must have stood out nearly at right
angles to the body, like a pair of oars. This is such
a peculiar attitude for a bird's legs that, although ap-
parently indicated by the shape of the bones, it was at
first thought to be due to the crushing and consequent
distortion to which the bones had been subjected, and
an endeavor was made to place them in the ordinary
position, even at the expense of a dislocation of the
joints. But when the mounting of the skeleton had
advanced further, it became evident that Hesperornis
was no ordinary bird and could not swim in the usual
manner, since this would have brought his knee-caps
uncomfortably up into his body. And so, at the cost of
much time and trouble, the mountings were so changed
that the legs stood out at the sides of the body, as
shown in the picture, a position verified later by the
discovery of the specimen now in the American Mu-
seum of Natural History, in which the limbs lay in
jii^t the position given them by the artist. Mr. Glceson.
Page Six
E VOLUT I ON
August. 1929
Hesperornis was prol^ably covered with smooth, soft
feathers. This we know because Professor Williston
found a specimen showing the impression of the skin
of the lower leg, as well as of feathers that covered the
"thigh" and head. While such a covering seems rather
inadequate for a bird of such exclusively aquatic
habits, there seems to be no getting away from the
facts. And we do have in the Snake Bird, one of the
most aquatic of modern birds, an instance of a similar-
ly poor covering. Its feathers shed the water very
imperfectly, and after long-continued submersion be-
come saturated, which partly accounts for the habit
the bird has of hanging itself out to drv.
Evolution: Fact or Fake?
Conclusion of the Debate held at Mecca Auditorium,
New York, February 7, J929. betzveen Professor
Joseph McCabe of England and Reverend W. B. Riley
of Minneapolis on the question : "Resolved. That Evo-
lution Is True and Should Be Taught in the Schools."
Two previous issues contained the opening speeches
and Professor McCabc's second speech.
THE CHAIRMAN: Dr. Riley again for twenty
minutes. (Applause.)
* ♦ *
DR. W. B. RILEY: Mr. Chairman, ladies and
gentlemen : In my former address I began where the
Professor left ofT. This time I propose to take the
opposite position and begin where he began and track
him down.
His declaration that evolution is a science is, as I
stated in the first instance, a matter of counting noses.
If the scientists agree, that settles it. How can that
settle it? If the matter were a matter of science, there
would be a demonstration of it. That is what I have
listened for, and I have listened in vain.
If there is a living man on the face of the earth that
can bring me one instance, either out of geological
testimony, or, out of observation, where one species
ever evolved into another, he will produce the first
argument for this thing that has ever been found.
I want you also to see that the Professor is not sin-
cere in reaching his conclusion, that because scientific
men agree he is bound to believe it. He is not sincere.
The scientists of the world in religion are agreed,
for the most part, on the existence of a God, certainly
as perfectly agreed as the material scientists are agreed
upon this subject, for while Evolutionists come to a
kindred conclusion, they divide over every point in the
so-called progress.
Now, I want to ask the Professor if he will accept
these gentlemen, great, outstanding men in the realm
of religion, and will go with them for a personal God
because they are so overwhelmingly in the majority?
Why isn't the thing that is good in one realm equal-
ly good in another?
Here are a few people who have spoken of the exist-
ence of God — William James — and this is a matter of
philosophy, not a matter of science at all. That is why
it was born with the old Greeks. That is why it is re-
born at the present time.
But William James opposes the Professor's views
as set forth in every one of McCabe's books that I
have read. Again, Professor McCabe repudiates the
ontological argument of .St. Anselm.
He will have none of Father Boedder's arguments.
He will have none of the reasonings of Dr.
\\'arschauer as they proceed from cause to effect. He
separates from Sir Oliver Lodge, concerning whom
McCabe asserted :
"He is a man of science and does not eke out his
arguments with quotations from ancient authorities
or foreigners whose names and authority the reader
is not likely to know."
The great Dr. Wallace, the matchless Lord Kelvin,
the notable Sir J. J. Thompson, Principal Lloyd
Morgan, Dr. Ballard, the immortal Bergson, Eucken,
Martineau, LaConte, John Fiske ; those several Amer-
ican professors who in 1897 published a book, "The
Conception of God": Dr. Rashdall. Professor James
Ward, the seven Oxford men who in 1912 gave to the
world their "Foundations," intended as a reconstruc-
tion of the Christian belief — these all have written
sufficiently well to disturb my opponents and lead them
to attempt an answer to each and every one of them, be-
cause they are united on the fact that there must be an
infinite Creator back of nature ; and yet. their united
testimony makes no profound impression upon Mr.
McCabe, so deeply immersed is he in the atheistic doc-
trine of evolution.
When Henry Fairfield Osborne, one of our first
.\merican scientists, claims, as he does in his recent
l;)ook. that the great outstanding minds of the world
today believe in God, and that many of them are ad-
vocates of the Christian religion ; and even when no
less a name than that of Robert Millikan joins him
at once in the exercise of that faith and its far-reaching
influence, the united testimony of these is all swept
aside by McCabe. For what reason? To save the face
of the false and atheistic philosophy of evolution.
With not one of them will he agree concerning God.
Why not be consistent? If we are going to accept
this because the scientists say it. why not accept God
in His creative acts, because men who are scientists in'
religion, have agreed upon the subject?
I do not need to tell you that I am not intellectual.
The Professor will tell you that. He has already told
you of his own ! The man who is intellectual will never
have to assert it. He doesn't need to assert it.
Now, he said I passed over some of his points. I be-
lieve I did, two of them. One of them was about the
blue and white and red stars, or. to get them straight,
blue, red and white stars. Will you tell me why in the
world that confirms the evolutionary hypothesis?
There isn't a single hint in Genesis or a claim on the
August, 1929
EVOLUTION
Page Seven-
part of any living, intelligent man to the effect that
Grod made all stars or siderial systems in one moment.
"In the begininng God created the heavens." You can
stretch that just as far as you want to.
Go back sixty millions or two hundred and forty
millions as others of them say, or go back if you want
to into the billions and trillions as others of them say,
or go back if you want to to the eternity of matter.
Some worlds will be older than others. That is no con-
firmation whatever of Evolution !
Now, the other thing that I have forgotten to touch
upon is that there is not, he said, one single form of
life that does not answer to the evolutionary hypothesis.
On the other hand, I dare assert that there is not one
form of life, known to the human being, that does
answer to it. Not one. Not one known living man has
ever seen anything in nature's processes that could for
one minute be employed as proof that the process
known as evolution was going on at all. Not a thing.
I lectured one night in South Minnesota. A lioy
who had been two years in high school and who had
the textbooks given him, came up to me and said :
"You have done very well. I think you have
proved that we cannot prove our position. Neither
ran you prove yours."
I said: "How many illustrations would you like?"
He said : "Give me a few."
I said : "I can give you a million examples right on
the farm." Have you ever heard of a hen that hatched
anything than a chicken? Have you ever heard of fuy
animal or any plant that produced after another kind?
Have you ? Varieties, yes, but species, none :
That is the testimony of Bateson, and the moment
he said it, they discredited him. If you agree with us.
you are a scientist, but if you .dissent you are not a
scientist and you are ignorant. That is the process of
argument that Evolutionists employ.
Bees and ants we can trace farther Isack than al-
most anything else. Out of 9,560 separate specimens
93 species and 43 genera Wheeler and Ford said there
was not a particle of change in all the ages throughout
which they could trace them. No evolution anywhere.
There is your case. Professor. You were asking for
one. Set that down, if you please.
I read an article in the Atlantic Monthly some two
or three years ago on evolution wrecked on the bees'
knees. I said: "This is news to me." I did not know-
there were bees' knees. I can prove by the bees' knees
that evolution is impossible.
He said that everytjiing that the bee does involves
him in sticky stuff. When he varnishes the base to
build, when he gets into the comb that he works into
the interstices of his body, it is sticky stuff'. When he
gets nectar, it is sticky stuff. Every single one of them
would gum him up in such a way that, like some
people — no personal reference. Professor— he won'd
be stuck on himself ; he would perish but for one
thing: viz., he goes down on his knees and there are
combs, and he cleans the antennae and ])roboscis on
the combs.
How many million years would it require for that
l)ee to evolve a comb on his knee that was adequate to
its demand, and would it not perish a million times?
While waiting the evolution, admit adajitation and you
ciincede intelligent creation.
I want now to conclude wliat 1 liave to say in this
second address by going back again to the question as
to whether it should be taught. Here, again. I charge
the Professor with insincerity, absolute insincerity.
It is certainly the truth that the great moral law,
the decalogue of the Bil)le. is true. 1 f not. then all the
nations of the world — his own included — have gone
wrong : and yet he is not in the company of those that
have pleaded to have that book placed or retained in
tlie pu))lic schools. Not at all. Why not be consistent?
It you are going to teach everything, whether the
people want it or not, why not bring the Bible that
was banished back? There are only six states that
will not permit the Bible to exist in them by law. There
are six that demand its reading m the school.s. And
there are thirty odd that leave it up to the attorney
general and to the superintendent of instruction, and
in practically every case they have l)anished the Bible.
( .Applause. ) I know the reason why it is rejected. It
is impalatal)le to infidels and atheists!
[f you are going to teach this theory, then teach side
by side with it, the creative theory. If we are going to
ha\e men lecturing in school on evolution, then I dare
tlieni til let me lecture therein on creation. Only in a
few instances can we get them to concede that favor.
I am here tonight to tell you that when this doctrine
Iiecomes a little more recognized, you will reap the
fruitful harvest that is sweeping over our land now.
I spent the past summer in Scotland and Ireland.
I he overwhelming majority of the people of that
country do not believe in this doctrine. They do not
be'ieve in it, and I know it from immediate contact
with the people. I am not talking to you about a few
jjrofessors. I am talking to you about people at large.
Unfortunately, a good many of the criminals of that
country, just because it is easy to cross the ocean, have
come over to our side, and we have more than be-
long to us. (Applause and hisses.)
There was a time when the deism doctrine — verj
nuich nkin to this — in fact, it is identical with it in
manv respects — it says th^it God had nothing to di.'
with creative acts; that He created tlie universe. an(
started it and went off and left it.
Now, they said He did not create it. That i^ tin
doctrine of evolution. It leaves God out.
.And the Professor himself is a special advocate of
the .same doctrine that was put into Haeckel's "Riddle
of the I^niverse" ruling God out. (Applause.)
And France went through the strain of deism.
.Vnd what was the result? The Reign of Terror.
Professor Williams of Oxford University said of
f!i? Nietzsche philosophy — that is this identical thing —
that he was tlie only man that had lived that had the
h.ard'linod to carrv it. to its legitimate results, and when
I. Continued on Page 12)
Page Eight
E \^ O L U T I O N
August, 1929
EUOLUTION
A Journal of Nature
To combat bigotry and superstition and
develop the open mind by popularizing
natural science
Published monthly by
Evolution Publishing Corporation
96 Fifth Ave., New York. N. Y.
Tel.: Watkins 75 87
L. E. KattERFELD, Managing Editor
Allan Strong BROMS, Science Editor
Subscription rate: One dollar per year
In lists of five or more, fifty cents.
Foreign subscriptions ten cents extra.
Single copy 10c; 20 or more. 5c each.
Entered as second class matter at the
Post Office at New York. N. Y.. January
7. 1928. under the Act of March 3. 1879.
N'OL. II, No. S.
AUGUST, 1929
IF YOU HAVE A NEW ADDRESS
notif}' us promptly, giving- also your
old address, so we can correct mail-
inar list.
THAT TRUTH MAY PREVAIL
Among scientific men there is a con-
tinuous exchange of facts and opinions,
the discovery and passing along of new
knowledge and a consequent recasting
of old theories to fit the new facts.
Theories are frankly held subject to
change, held now because they seem
best to fit the known facts, but pre-
tending to no finality at all. And this
attitude holds for even those opinions
most firmly evidenced and accepted, as
witness the Einstein criticism of the
"law of gravitation." Which all goes
to say that your typical scientist is
modestly open-minded. To him there
is no last word, no final authority.
Therefore he is ever exploring, ever
criticizing, ever thinking. Out of this
comes more knowledge — and clearer
theoretical guidance in the quest for
still more truth. And it all comes of
intellectual honesty which withholds
no fact for fear of its logical con-
sequences and spares no opinion what-
ever its source.
This attitude is one that fundamental-
ists, set on proving their "word of
God," cannot appreciate at its honest
worth. When a scientific evolutionist
revises his theory, be it in most minor
detail, they distort it into a general
retreat and proclaim it victoriously far
and wide. He honestly states facts
that cast doubt and they magnify that
into full confession. Your scientist is
being honest and they Jesuitical. That
the truth may prevail, he states the
whole case, doubts and all. For the
"glory" of their gods they practice
sophistry and appeal to prejudice. And
so It is that he advances truth, while
thev obstruct it. — .Mlau S. Broms.
MECHANIST VERSUS VITALIST
"When the subject (of life) is rea-
soned about in terms of cause and ef-
fect, one group of thinkers, who call
themselves vitalists, holds that life is
rh'.e to the presence in living organisms
of some 'all-controlling, unknown, and
unknow-able,. mystical, hyper-mechan-
ical force.' Such a view of life is
satisfying only to the reasoning of the
dogmatic thinker. It does not prove
helpful to the scientist because it
closes the mind to observable and veri-
fiable fact when in search for truth;
it removes the whole subject of adap-
tation to environment from the realm
of investigation. No biologist makes
use of such a working hypothesis —
however useful the concept may be as
a premise for the philosophical reason-
ing of an absolutist. There is a tinge
of vitalism in the philosophy of a
goodly number of those who consider
themselves scientific; but to this ex-
tent they limit the range of their ob-
servations — they inhibit the use of their
powers of induction.
"A far more satisfactory hypothesis
or viewpoint for the study of vital
phenomena, and one strictly in accord
with scientific method, is called the
mechanistic z'ieziK The vie-v\-point here
taken is that this conception is con-
sistent with the premises and working
hypothesis used by the other natural
scientists — the only one that is con-
sistent with reasoning about the facts
which stare the biologist in the face
when he looks at the structure and
functioning of ors?anic tissue through a
microscope. In other words, the point
of view which has proved of the
greatest advantage for scientific ob-
servation is, that life is a manifestation
of energy in a neculiar kind of mechan-
ism — 'a new kind of world stuff' which
is the phvsical basis of biolotrical sci-
ence." — H. H. Newman in "Modern
Scientific Knowledge."
should net study the earth or the stars,
the plants, the animals, the growth of
humanity." Luther Burbank says :
"Those who would legislate against the
teachings of evolution should also legis-
late against gravity, electricity and the
unreasonable velocity of light, and also
should introduce a clause to prevent the
use of the telescope, the microscope and
the spectroscope or any other instru-
ment of precision which inay in future
l;e invented, constructed or used for the
discovery of truth," Dr. Henry Fair-
field Osborn expressed the views of all
broadly educated men and women, and
completely confuted the claims of "Bible
opponents" of evolution, in saying: "No
teacher can possibly teach zoology or
any other branch of science truthfully
and intelligently if evolution is left out;
the cutting out of evolution from edu-
cation is exactly like taking the heart
from the body, for evolution is at the
very heart or center of education and
always will be."
Anti-evolution laws will be ignored
the same as the law against teaching
that the earth moves. This also con-
flicts with the Bible which states that
Joshua made the sun stand still. Evolu-
tion is now being taught in all three of
our anti-evolution states, by calling it
"development." What I object to is that
these laws cultivate hypocrisy. They
are turning our schools into "speak-
easies" and our teachers into "boot-
leggers." Bob Lyle,
REGARDING "THE CAUSE"
IT seems to worrv the fundamentalists
a lot that "Evolution teaches an ef-
fect or result without any cause." If
evolution could teach the "cause" it
would be an exception to all other
natural laws. Does the law that "Water
seeks its own level" teach anvthins about
a cause? We know that water does seek
its own level, because that hannens to
be the wav this law operates. Through
investigation we find that the earth pulls
heavier obiects toward its center, and
this is called the law of sravitv. Why
accent these laws as perfectly natural,
while demanding that evolution show
some cause — a supernatural cause pre-
ferred?
Dr. David .Starr Jordan, of Leland
Stanford Universitv. savs : "Kvoltitton
nnd nature mean the same thine — 'Or-
derly change.' To say that we should
not study evolution is to say that we
AN EVENT WE ENJOYED
One of EVOLUTION'S most inter-
ested friends, Mr, A. Nielen, a youth
of eighty years, world traveler, philos-
opher and photo artist, was a caller in
New York last week. He delighted a
group of New York readers of EVO-
LUTION with a travelog, "A Trip
Around The World," showing several
hundred beautifully colored lantern
slides of "the quaint, the queer and
the beautiful," made from photos
taken by himself. Mr. Nielen has an
exceptional sense for the interesting
and picturesque, and some of his slides
are the most wonderful we have ever
seen. His remarks while showing them
were delightfully entertaining and con-
tained many gems of wisdom. We
look forward to another showing when
he returns.
SKIP SEPTEMBER
Our next issue, Vol. II, No. 6, will
be out the last of September, but
drited October.
GIVE IT TO YOUR FRIENDS
The article on next page, "Our
Knowledge of Man," by Dr, Hrdlicka
of Smithsonian Institution, appeared
as editorial in The Outlook, We shall
reprint it also as a leaflet ($1.00 per
100, $5.00 per 1,000). Help distribute
it far and wide.
August. 1929
E \' O L U T I O N
Page Nine
Our Growing Knowledge of Man
By ALES HRDLICKA
Reprinted by courtesy of The Outlook
An endeavor to account for man's
origin has been universal. Study of the
myths and beliefs of different people^
.shows that there was no tribe, no eth-
nic group, no religious unit, that did
not have some theory, however crude,
as to how man came into existence.
And before science came in, once an
idea became set in any group, it con-
stituted a dogma which effectively
stopped or greatly retarded further
thought in that direction. Religious
dogmas, being directly associated with
the deities (revelations), became par-
ticularly powerful. Had it not been
for the Biblical account, especially,
current thoughts about man's oi'igin
and his knowledge of himself as w^ell
as that of the rest of the living nature,
would have developed much earlier.
An analysis of the conceptions
reached on the subject before the ad-
vent of the scientific period, shows that
the numerous forms group themselves
into three main classes. They are:
CI) wholly thaumaturgic, or (Z) partly
supernatural and partly natural, or (?l^
essentially natural.
The first class of theories regard
man's origin as due to purely super-
natural agencies and means, without
speculating as to the details. Manv of
the anthropogenies of primitive tribes
of today. to,gether with those of some
of the earlier Greeks, earlier Romans,
and one of the versions of the Genesis,
are or were of this nature.
The second class of views is sub-
divisible into two series. In the first,
common to the Egyptians, all the
Semitic peoples of .Asia Minor, some
of the Greeks fthe Hephaestus myths')
and to the second version of the
Genesis, man's body is made of earthly
materials (clay, bone, blood, etc.). with
the life and soul added supernaturallv.
In the second subclass of these beliefs,
common to some of the American In-
dians and others, man originates super-
naturallv from subterranean or recent-
ly emerged mythical birds or other
animal forms.
The third, naturalistic, or scientific
category of theories may aeain be
separated into two subclasses. The
first, held bv some of the early Greek
and other philosophers, such as Aris-
totle, and surviving largely to this day.
teach a natural, evolutionary origin of
the body, but believe in a distinct and
higher origin of the "soul:" while the
others claim an evolutionary origin of
all man's attributes, phvsical and in-
tellectual. The great difticultv in both
these lines is the lark of a definition of
the concent of "soul." Man has never
known clearly and does not know yet
just what is his "soul."
From the earliest time this tlrrd
class of views as to man's origin dif-
fered widely from both preceding ones
in being based on actual observation.
In the beginnings, in the time of .\nax-
imander and his followers, the obser-
vations were limited, imperfect und
empirical; but men w-ere gradually rec-
ognizing the close analogies between
man and the rest of the organisms
which surrounded him in the world.
True scientific observations by
learned men, however, and deductions
on the problem of human origin began
during the latter part of the Eight-
eenth Century, and hence long before
Charles Darwin. They attended on
one hand the work of the anatomist
and physiologist, on the other that of
the naturalist and the geologist-paleon-
tologist.
Buffon, Erasmus Darwin, Goethe,
Treviranus, Gall, Geoffroy St. Hilaire,
and a good number of others, headed
eventually by Lamarck, and later Wal-
lace, precede Charles Darwin; but it is
the latter w'ho, in 1871, in his "Descent
of Man," gives the first comprehensive
treatise on the subjct.
Buffon, Erasmus Darwin (grand-
father of Charles) and above all La-
marck, explained evolution by a grad-
ual inheritance of "acquired characters''
or structural adaptations, brought forth
by environmental conditions. For
Charles Darwin and his close follow-
ers, the essential factor in evolution,
human or animal, was "natural selec-
tion" or, as Herbert Spencer termed
it, the "survival of the fittest," work-
ing with the normal variation of every
organism and of every part. Organ-
isms vary; they also increase in num-
bers; the numerical increase leads to
competition and struggle for existence;
and in this struggle the most "fit" and
best adapted to their environment
survive and adv;.nce' the group in their
direction.
Since Lamarck and Darwin, the
theory of human origin by evolution
has been generally accepted by scien-
tific men and enriched by a whole
realm of observations and proofs, until
what had originally been a theory has
become one of the best documented
pages of human knowledge.
At present, the essentials of man's
origin through evolution are estab-
lished facts. Still uncertain are many
of the details of the highly complex
processes involved, the exact sources
from which man developed and the
causes and ways of his differentiation;
but these do not affect the soundness
of the main conclusion.
Meanwhile science is endeavoring to
solve more definitely the many still
more or less obscure by-problems of
human evolution. The efforts are part-
ly a patient intensive search for ad-
ditional material evidence, partly spec-
ulation. It is the latter that is respon-
sible for the various theories as to
man's precise ancestry, the exact time
of man's appearance, the true cradle-
land of humanity and the actual modes
of human evolution; theories that, be-
cause of their variance, are by many
mistaken for uncertainties of the main
subject. It is such differences that
may be seen in the recent writings of
Osborn, Gregory, Clark and others.
They depend on the basis and angle
from which the still imperfectly ex-
plored field is contemplated and on
other individual conditions. Similar
human gropings after truth, before it
has been fully revealed in material
facts, are common to all branches of
science. They are the useful "working
hypotheses" of science, lasting until
they are shown to be erroneous, or
until replaced by better conceptions.
They help toward the eventual reach-
ing and crystallization of human
knowledge.
Already, however, the cultured man
and woman are becomina less curious
about their remote ancestors, less con-
cerned about the past, and are direct-
ing their attention to the next pro-
blems, which are man's further differ-
entiation in the nresent, with the prom-
ises and indications for the future.
OFF WITH THT^'M FALSE
WHISKERS
The Reverend Professor Leander S.
Keyser, D.D., in "Bible Champion,"
May. 1929, page 226:
"That vehement propagandist, the
magazine called Evnhition . . . tells
us some of the authors and publish-
ers of text-books are keeping evolu-
tion in their books under cover in
a decentive way . . . cut out the word
'evolution' but inculcate {sic!) the
doctrine in disguised form. Some
people pronose simply to suhstitute
the word- 'development' which may
be used to describe the same doc-
trine. Let the good people of Ten-
nessee, Arkansas and Texas be on
their guard . . . People should re-
member that it is the theory of evo-
lution that is not to be taught, by
whatever name it poses."
Now the curious thing about this
passage is that "the theory of evolu-
tion" is entirely legal for anybodv to
teach all he likes anywhere in North
.America. The only thing forbidden in
"Tennessee, Arkansas and Texas"
(the monkey states really are Tennes-
see, Arkansas and Mississippi) is the
Hcsccnt of man. If. then, "authors and
publishers of textbooks" do not choose
to exercise their legal ri'-'ht to include
"the theory of evolution" itself under
that particular name, or for that mat-
ter if they do. why should the Rever-
end Professor Keyser interfere with
thoni- They are all within their rights
under the actual statute.
Hasn't the Reverend Professor read
his own fool law? Or does he think
that o'her people haven't? E. T. B.
Page Ten
EVOLUTION
August, 1929
TWO EXPEDITIONS STUDY
APES IN AFRICA
Two scientific expeditions from Am-
erica are now in Africa studying the
apes and primitive man, in both body
and mind. One, sent by the American
Museum of Natural History and the
College of Physicians and Surgeons of
Columbia University, includes Henry
C. Raven, Associate Curator of Com-
parative Anatomy at the Museum, with
extensive field experience in Africa and
the East Indies; William K. Gregory,
Professor of Vertebrate Paleontology
at Columbia and author of "Our Face
from Fish to Man" and other works on
evolution; J. H. McGregor, Professor
of Zoology at Columbia, authority on
the anatomy of apes and man, and E. T.
Engle of the College of Physicians and
Surgeons, specialist in endocrinology
and physiology.
They will study problems of man's
evolutionary history and of his physical
welfare in the future. On the medical
side, studies will be made of posture
and faulty mechanical adjustments, of
the endocrine glands, of reproductive
organs and processes, of blood tests
and parasitic conditions. They hold
that medical progress must be built
upon broader knowledge of the funda-
mental laws of life and health, upon a
better understanding of the origin and
functions of the structures of the
human body. More specifically, the
purposes of the expedition are:
1. To bring back primate specimens
for thorough anatomical, physiological
and embryological studies under favor-
able laboratory conditions.
2. To make motion pictures and
photographs of aboriginal tribes.
3. To procure complete adult speci-
mens of different species of gorilla,
previous specimens of adults having
been limited to skins an.d skeletons.
Because the gorilla closely approaches
man in body structures, this feature is
of outstanding scientific value.
The second expedition, headed by
Harold C. Bingham, research associate
of the Institute of Psychology at Yale,
is working in the Belgian Congo under
the auspices of the Carnegie Institution
and Yale University, largely on prob-
lems of ape psychology. Motion pic-
tures will record the individual every-
day life of the African mountain go-
rillas in the reserve set aside by the
Belgian Government for their preser-
vation. Plans call for a whole year in
the field.
for it. Of course we can not send it
free of charge, but we will be glad to
supply Libraries at 60c. per year to
the extent that our readers will fur-
nish the funds.
A good start for this LIBRARY
FUND is given by contributions from
two friends, A. Kalmanoff, $50, and
\V. T. Bush, $20.
Will you also help? Exery $3 will
send EVOLITTION one year to five
libraries. You may either specify the
libraries, or leave the selection to us.
ATTENTION, TEACHERS
A number of science teachers used
EVOLUTION in their classes last
year with splendid results. Some High
School biology departments took 100
copies of each issue.
Our paid in advance bundle rate is
only Sc per copy. A bundle of five for
the nine issues that will appear during
the school year amounts to $2.25, ten
$4.50, etc. If you prefer we'll send
you as many as you want on consign-
ment at the regular news stand rate
of 6c, to be paid after delivery. Simply
write us how many to send you. .A.11
school orders will begin with the Oc-
tober issue, which will contain no
commercial advertising.
TO SUPPLY LIBRARIES
Many thousands of people would be
reached by the message of EVOLU-
TION if we could place the magazine
in every Public and School Library
Reading Room. Most libraries would
be glad to display EVOLUTION in
their reading room, even though their
budgets do not permit them to pay
PROMOTING EVOLUTION
Our closest friends know that we
started without capital and have to
raise several hundred dollars to bring
out each issue. All surplus above pro-
duction costs is used for promotion.
When sufficient paid circulation has
been achieved the magazine will be
self-sustaining. In the meantime we
invite readers to send funds, and we
issue a share of our stock for every
ten dollars sent. The following gave
their support since the last issue:
M. Vonsovici, $30.00; C. Peter A.
Peterson, $10.00; Herman Prange,
$3.00; Caspar Hodgson, $10.00; L. T.
B. Light. $200.00; W. T. Bush, $20.00;
Michael Cohn, $20.00; Joseph Block,
$20.00 Martin Dewev, $200.00; John
Dequer, $10.00 E. E. Free, S2.50; F.
W. Hodge, $4.00; A. S. Keshin, $5.00;
C. N. Clauder, $1.00; Anne Frese,
$1.00; Bertha W. Howe. $3.00; E. S.
Wertheim, $10.00; W. C. Michel. $2.00;
Geo. Welby Van Pelt, $2.00; A Friend,
$25.00: Mignon Talbot, $10.00; L. D.
Abbott, $1.00; Mrs. T. M. Nagle, $5.00;
Eda B. Schenk?r. $4.00; Thos. Capek.
$4.00 Minot Simons, $5.00; B. C.
Gruenberg, $5.00; J. David Houser,
$5.00; Tobias Sigel. $10.00; A. L.
Davis, $2.00; Wm. F. Welling, $.50; Ed.
Hevn, $1.00; Anna Reinstein, $1.00;
Lucy Hall, $5.00.
The work can be pushed just to the
extent that funds are furnished. Will
you join this goodly group? To help
spread the message of EVOLUTION.
The Calf Path
Sam W-\lter Foss
One day through the primeval wood
.\ calf walked home as good calves
But made a trail all bent askew, [should,
A crooked trail, as all calves do.
Since then three hundred years have fled,
.^nd I infer the calf is dead.
But still he left behind his trail.
And thereby hangs my moral tale.
The trail was taken up next day
By a lone dog that passed that way.
And then a wise bell-wether sheep
Pursued the trail o'er hill and steep;
And drew the flock behind him, too.
As good bell-wethers always do.
And from that day, o'er hill and glade,
Through those old woods a path was
made.
.\nd many men wound in and out.
And dodged and turned and bent about.
And uttered words of righteous wrath
Because 'twas such a crooked path ;
But still they followed — do not laugh —
The first migrations of that calf.
And through the winding wood-way
stalked.
Because he wabbled when he walked.
This forest path became a lane
That bent and turned and turned again ;
This crooked lane became a road.
Where many a poor horse with his load
Toiled on beneath the burning sun,
-And travelled some three miles in one.
-And thus a century and a half
They trod the footsteps of that calf.
The years passed on in swiftness fleet,
The road became a village street;
.And this, before men were aware,
A city's crowded thoroughfare.
And soon the central street was this
Of a renowned' metropolis !
.And men two centuries and a half
Trod in the footsteps of that calf.
Each day a hundred thousand rout
Followed the zigzag calf about,
.And o'er his crooked journey went
The traffic of a continent.
.A hundred thousand men were led
By one calf three centuries dead.
They followed still his crooked way,
-And lost a hundred years a day ;
For thus such reverence is lent
To well established precedent.
.A moral lesson this might teach
Were I ordained and called to preach ;
For men are prone to go it blind
.Along the calf-paths of the mind,
.And work away from sun to sun
To do what other men have done.
They follow in the beaten track,
-And out and in, and forth and back.
-And still their devious way pursue.
To keep the path that others do.
They keep the path a sacred groove.
.Along which all their lives they move;
Rut how the wise old wood-gods laugh,
Who saw the first primeval calf.
Ah, many things this tale might teach —
But I am not ordained to preach.
August, 1929
E\-OLUTION
Page Elevex
The Amateur Scientist
A Monthly Feature conducted by Allan Strong Broms
PLANT OR ANIMAL— WHICH:
We rarely have trouble distinguish-
ing plants from animals. Usually ani-
mals can move and plants not, animals
having nervous reaction systems,
while plants have not. But Venus Fly-
trap and various sensitive plants do
react by movement and some very low
one-celled plants actually travel. Also,
sponges, which are animals, anchor
themselves and just vegetate. So tlie
scientist amplifies the popular tests by
considering methods of getting food.
details of structure, development, be-
havior, etc. But even the scientist is
stuck when he meets the slime-mold-.
jelly has disappeared shaping itself into
most elaborate and beautiful spore
bearing fruits. These are distinctive
for each species and are easy to pre-
serve. If you know what to look for,
you can probably find some in your
own yard.
But the first time you had better get
a guide who knows w^hat to look for
and where. But guides are few. The
New York Microscopical Society has
one in Robert Hagelstein who has spe-
cialized on the iIyceto::oa, for he thinks
them animals, and takes us on a couple
of "hunting trips" during the year.
Three common slime-molds on decaying wood; sporangia of Trichia; of Stemonitis
(Plasmodium remnant at base) ; and of Hemitrichia (with Plasmodium)
He does not know for sure what they
are — plants or animals. Some think
them plants and call them Myxomy-
cetes (slime-fungi), while others dis-
agree and call them Mycetozoa
(fungus-animals).
What makes the slime-mold so mys-
terious is that it lives its feeding life
as a moving animal, and then settles
down and reproduces itself by very ob-
vious plant spores. As an animal, its
working body is a mass of naked jelly
called a Plasmodium, suggesting the
term "slime," which slips along slowly
and engulfs its food like that simplest
of known animals, the amoeba. While
common in forests, in black soil,
fallen leaves and decaying logs, it
is seldom noticed, its shapeless yel-
low or other colored mass look-
ing like nothing in particular.
The Plasmodium lives in wood and sub-
stratumand appears on the surface only
when ready to fruit ; sometimes it seems
to be nothing but a wet spot on the log;
usually it is inconspicuously small, oc-
casionally eight inches across.
It is easiest to recognize at its plant
stage, although it is then just a scatter-
ing of small, almost microscopic,
spore cases. But it really looks like
something, especially if you get a good
close-up through a magnifying lens.
Almost over night, the Plasmodium
Sunday morning, July 7th, for instance,
we boarded the ten o'clock Long Isl-
and train in New York for Mineola
where he met us. He took us to a
damp forest kettle-hole on the edge
of the terminal moraine left by the last
great Ice sheet. First he warned us
against poison ivy and gave us an anti-
dote to wash our hands with (one part
of ferrous chloride to nine parts each
of water and glycerine). Next he
showed us samples from his own col-
lection and then turned us loose among
the dead leaves and rotting logs.
We found plenty of sporangia, but
only two or three Plasmodia, One of
the latter was a greenish-yellow net-
work of slime on the end of a dead
twig. Another was just a "wet spot"
on a piece of bark, but the wetness
showed a pattern, and sporangia were
already grown from part of it. Our
real harvest was in sporangia. Each of
us carried a cigar box and a supply
of pins. When we found a colony of
sporangia, we broke or cut off a piece
of the wood or leaf and pinned it to the
bottom of the box. This keeps the
specimens from tumbling around and
breaking the very delicate spore cases.
The later preserving is just a matter of
thorough drying and the keeping away
of insects.
Our guide told us we had a really
EVOLUTION LECTURES
We have arranged a course of ten
lectures to be given Saturday evenings,
Oct. 12 to Dec. 14, inclusive, in the
Labor Temple, 14th Street and Second
Avenue, New York.
The general subject will be "Evo-
lution: The Master Key," the idea be-
ing not merely to present the conven-
tional evidence for evolution, but
■ rather to show how the idea of evo-
lution illumines every field of natural
science today.
Four of the lectures will be given
by Allan Strong Broms, our science
editor, whose course of lectures was
so well received last spring. The other
six will be offered by authorities in the
fields of Biology, Anthropology, As-
tronomy, Geology, Psychology and
Education who will tell how the fact
of evolution helps them to solve their
special problems. Detailed announce-
ment will appear in our next issue.
In the meantime we invite our
friends to take course tickets in ad-
vance to furnish the necessary funds
for advertising. Admission to single
lectures will be 50c, but those order-
ing in advance will get HALF PRICE,
that is TWO tickets for the entire
course of ten lectures for $5.00. May
we hear from you?
The Duck-baied Platypus
A Rhyme,
by Walter C, Kr.\atz
Of all the Mammals the one most queer,
On all this wide, old, mundane sphere.
Is the so-called duck-billed platypus.
Four legs and fur like a regular "cuss";
But minus teeth ; has bill for eats.
Though nourishing young on tiny teats.
She lays her eggs like a regular bird,
Or reptile, no matter if it seems absurd.
It means to us who are able to think :
This beast is a real connecting link.
poor day, though we felt quite happy
in having found so many after such a
recent opening of our eyes. But it
seems there are three hundred species
throughout the world and this one
kettle-hole had already yielded about a
hundred, a couple of them quite new.
We had nothing like that and he was
really disappointed, for he knew his
logs by their first names and expected
much more of them, especially when
he brought company. However, there
is another day coming, for the slime-
molds are to be found from March to
December, and we are to have another
"hunt" on September 29th, the same
guide, the same place, the same train,
and the same good time. Incidentally,
everyone is invited. .Tust bring your
lunch and a hand magnifier.
Page Twelve
EVOLUTION
August, 1929
{Continued from Page 7)
he did it it proved a transvaluation of all values and
the degradation of all moralities.
As an American citizen born in this country, after
generations and generations of ancestral voters, I
stand for my land, and while my voice lasts, I expect
to lift it up in opposing a doctrine that hasn't a scin';ilia
of evidence in the heaven above, the earth beneath, or
the waters under the earth. (Applause.)
I say as a father of six children, as a teacher of f"ur
hundred in my school, as a taxpayer, and consequeurly
a citizen, I shall do my utmost to put this thing out of
the public schools of America. I thank you.
(Applause and hisses.)
* * *
THE CHAIRMAN: Professor McCabe will now
close with five minutes.
PROFESSOR JOSEPH McCABE: I am afraid
this audience must be entirely fundamentalist and is
trying to prevent me from getting my precious five
minutes (referring to prolonged applause). (Laughter.)
Dr. Riley, as I expected, in his first speech declined
to follow the lead that I gave him and waited until
his second speech, knowing that I have only five min-
utes to answer that Niagara of argument that he put
out. The order of this meeting has been altered at the
request of Dr. Riley. After the second speech we were
to have ten minutes each in which we might have deah
more or less satisfactorily with each other. As it is,
what do you expect me to do in five minutes? For-
tunately, the greater part of what Dr. Riley said was
entirely irrelevant to this debate tonight.
f VOICES: Right! Hooray! Appbuse.)
I am appealing only to such members of this audience
as are going to give us a sober, intellectual verdict on
the question. The best thing that I could do to give Dr.
Riley a chance was this : to inform him that all scien-
tific men are agreed. I do not count noses. I did not
ask you to believe evolution because all scientific men
are agreed. I said if they are all agreed, you will ex-
pect something very serious and very substantial from
Dr. Riley. Did you get it? (VOICES : No.)
So far as my analysis goes, he has at last given me
one thing to reply to. I told him that all the facts of
the universe are in keeping with evolution. He asked
me to run over all the facts of the universe and show
it. (Laughter.) Surely, the best opportunity I could
give Dr. Riley was to tell me one that is inconsistent.
That is logic. Tell me one that is inconsistent and my
case falls. At last I got one supposed inconsistency,
the bees. (Laughter.) And once more Dr. Riley does
not know the elements of the subject. (Laughter.)
Of fourteen families of bees twelve have no means
of making wax or using wax whatever, and the only
fossil bees we have belong to those families that never
make any wax whatever. Dr. Riley said the bees and
ants are the oldest forms of life. They are, on the con-
trary, amongst the youngest.
I claim, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I claim
that I put before you this statement : The whole uni-
verse is the basis of evolution, and Dr. Rilev must
show you facts which will bring that statement to the
ground and show things inconsistent with evolution.
He has not done so. I claim, therefore, in conclusion,
that this anti-evolution campaign is founded upon a
complete ignorance of scientific teaching. (Applause.)
Dr. Riley has accused me of insulting America. I
have been for ten years the most friendly interpreter
of American life in the whole of Europe. Never for
a single moment have I said a word against America.
That is why I am here before you tonight.
Well, I submit to you that the doctrine of evolution
is proved. This anti-evolution doctrine, which has
made America conspicuous before the educational
world, is not proved. It rests upon complete — not only
complete ignorance, but complete misrepresentation of
science from beginning to end. ( Applause. ) And
while I admit that parents can determine what shall
be taught to their children, I do not admit that any
expert people shall not freely tell parents what is true
and what is not true. Who is going to decide? Ladies
and gentlemen, I put it up to you. You have seen to-
night how the anti-evolution campaign in America is
engineered. (Applause.)
I appeal to you. This is my last word, and believe
me as in other matters I have been explaining in Eng-
land for years what is the meaning of the funda-
mentalist campaign. I ask that New York shall at last
assert its rightful position as the cultural leader of one
of the greatest civilizations of modern times. I ask that
.\merica shall purge its intellectual prestige of this
stain that has been imposed upon it, and that you will
be prepared to lead, not only your States, but lead
the world in wisdom and in justice and in peace.
(Prolonged applause.)
^ * tf
The Chairman took a rising vote of the audience,
which expressed itself at least ten to one in favor of
Evolution and Prof. McCabe. The vote recorded by
the official judges was 12 for the Affirmative and 17
for the Negative, but the poll of the High School Class
seated on the stage as unofficial judges was 36 to 5 in
favor of the Affirniative.
HOW IT HAPPENED TO HAPPEN
SOME of our friends can not understand how we could
select judges for the New York evolution debate who
could vote 17 to 12 in favor of the fundamentaHst. In fair-
ness to Prof. McCabe we should explain. The original
plan was to have 16 judges selected by EVOLUTION, 15
by friends of Dr. Riley, and 1 by mutual agreement. The
afternoon of the debate we had secured our 16 acceptances,
but only 5 of Dr. Riley's Committee had accepted. So, with
our consent, he invited a long list of friends, and since he
could not tell beforehand which ones would come we
agreed to pass them all through at the front door with the
understanding that the proper number would be selected to
sit as judges when they arrived backstage.
Not all of the judges selected by EVOLUTION showed f
up, but enough of Dr. Riley's friends arrived to bring the
total list up to 29. The gentleman in charge of the stage
did not know one from the other and seated them all. There
was some discussion regarding the matter when the vote
was about to be taken, but it was then too late to do any-
thing about it, and Dr. Riley is entitled to all the consola-
tion that he can derive from the judges" decision under the
circumstances.
August. 1929
E\'OLUTION
Page Thirteen
m NEW BOOKS m
MODERN SCIENTIFIC KNOWL-
EDGE, edited bj^ Frederick A.
Cleveland. Ronald Press, $4.50.
This one-volume Outline of Modern
Science deserves reading. Unlike that
otherwise excellent "Outline" by
Thomsorf (adequate only as an "Out-
line of Biology"), it really covers the
whole field. Written originally by a
number of authors, its several sections
vary in excellence, but remain popu-
lar throu.ghout. One would expect
marked gaps and duplications in a
symposium of this sort, but it has
been so well edited and obviously re-
written that it has the continuity and
coherence of single authorship.
The introductory section deals ap-
preciatively with the scientific method
and the place of science in modern life
and thinking. The contrast with the
unscientific thinking of the theological
and other "absolutists" is forcefully
set forth in a way that leaves little to
be desired.
Much of the material is necessarily
"old stuff," but very properly emphasis
is placed on recent scientific develop-
ments. The chapters on atomic physics
and chemistry, on the colloidal state
of matter and on genetics are note-
worthy. Especially so are those on
Psychology, in which the viewpoint is
illuminatingly evolutionary and be-
havioristic, as is suggestively indicated
by each of several chapter headings
containing the words "adjustive
mechanism." It is to be regretted
that the inconsequential chapters on
Personality and especially those on
Sociology do not continue this key-
note, but lapse into a static and legal-
istic treatment that fails completely in
outlining the really basic achieve-
ments in social science, and so finish
most weakly a valuable book other-
wise excellently conceived and done.
The text is sparingly, yet adequate-
ly, illustrated with well chosen and
pertinent drawings from a wide range
of sources. Nearly every chapter is
followed by bibliographies and review
questions for the benefit of the more
thorough student. Each question is
stated suggestively and followed by a
brief list of references. In addition
there are two general bibliographies
with each chapter, one for popular
reading, the other technical. These
special features add much to the value
of the volume as a textbook and as a
busy man's guide to the basic facts
^ and principles of modern scientific
▼ knowledge. A. S. B.
WHO WOULD?
No wonder science puzzles us.
Such noble names it plies;
Who'd ever dream ichneumondes
Were tiny, tiny flies? — Ex.
OLD CIVILIZATIONS OF THE
NEW WORLD. By A. Hyatt
Verrill. Bobbs-Merrill Company, 393
pages. Illustrated. $5.
The most fascinating and at the same
time the most perplexing field of ar-
chaeology is the study of the pre-his-
tory of Central and South America.
Henry George's words, "Behind dead
empires, dim ghosts of empire loom,"
were never more aptly applied than to
the vast ruins and remains of Mexico,
Panama, Colombia, Honduras, Ecua-
dor, Bolivia, and Peru. The casual
reader who fancies that all of Ameri-
can archaeology is comprised in a sur-
vey of the Mayas, the Aztecs, and the
miscalled Incas, with a side glance at
the Mound Builders, the Clifif Dwell-
ers, and a few other extinct peoples of
our own continent, is due for both a
shock and a thrill in Dr. Verrill's ab-
sorbing and enlightening book.
Who were the Code dwellers, whose
city Dr. Verrill himself discovered?
Who were the Chimus? The Chibchas?
The Tiahuanacans? The Pre-Incans?
The Toltecs — if such a race ever ex-
isted? The Nascas? The builders of
the pink porphyry cities of Peru?
Where did these various peoples come
from? When did they flourish? Why
was their empire destroyed in each
case, and when? Why is there in no
instance any gradual development of a
culture, but utterly dissimilar civiliza-
tions appear full-grown, without an-
tecedents? Why were the tropics,
where progress is usually slowed up, in
.America the scene of the greatest civil-
izations, whereas temperate South and
North America displayed no such phe-
nomenon? Were any of these peoples
related or culturally connected, and if
so, which?
These and many other questions Dr.
Verrill can answer only by saying,
"We do not know. In a day or a year
we may discover the answer, but at
present the problem is insoluble." One
thing he does know, however, and
gives the evidence for — the vast an-
tiquity of man, and of civilized man, in
America.
"Old Civilizations of the New
World" is written by a man who is
not only a real authority on his sub-
ject, but also a rarely interesting
writer. In dealing with the better
known civilizations, those of the Az-
tecs, the Mayas, and the Inca dynasty
nf Peru, he is no less enthralling in his
narrative than when he is revealing for
the first time in popular form the
knovi-n facts of the still more mysteri-
ous and obscure peoples of South Am-
erica. Discoverer not only of Code,
in Panama, "the Pompeii of America,"
l)ut also of the only wheels known in
the remains of prehistoric America,
and, in his earlier work as a zoologist,
of the supposedly extinct Solcuodoti
I'liradoxus, in Santo Domingo, and of
the strange bearded Indians of Bolivia,
he seems to have a genius for bringing
to light new and pregnant finds in two
distinct branches of science.
Diffidently I suggest a possible ex-
planation of one of his minor mysteries
in this book. In commenting on the im-
possibility that such work as must
have been done by several of these
extinct races could have been accom-
plished with the very crude stone im-
plements which alone are found with
them — work which ranges from abso-
lutely true fitting of massive stone
building blocks, or intricate lacework
designs cut out of solid rock, to en-
graved gold beads smaller than the head
of a pin — Dr. Verrill states that he
finds no possible explanation why,
granting that metal instruments might
have disappeared (though this is im-
probable if they were deposited with
the finds, for even feather-work and
textiles are preserved in that dry at-
mosphere), the badly made stone tools
and weapons should be there at all. Is it
not possible that they were left just
because they were useless — because
they were ancient, or imitations of the
ancient, and had a religious signifi-
cance? Most of these ruins are of
temples, and we know to this day how
outworn customs and implements are
still retained in church ritual. The
workers, in other words, took their de-
veloped tools home with them; but the
stone axes used by their remote an-
cestors had a place of honor at the
altar.
Be that as it may, a book like this
fires one to wonder and contemplation.
"Old Civilizations of the New World"
is literally a truly inspiring work.
Maynard Shipley.
Evolution Bonk Shelf
MODIiRN .SCIENTU-TC K.NOWLEDGE:
Ediled by Fredk A. Cleveland $4.0(1
OLD CIVILIZATIONS OF THE NEW
WORLD : A. Hyatt Verrill 5.00
WHAT IS DARWINISM : T. H. Morgan. . $1.00
OUR FACE FRO.M FISH TO .MAN: Win.
K. Gregory 4.50
INSTINCT AND INTELLIGENCE: Major
R. \V. G. Hhigslon 2.50
SCIENCE & GOOD BEHAVIOR: Parsh-
ley 2.50
This puzzling PLjVNET: Edwin Teu-
iiej- lirewbler 4.00
A-ll-C OF EVOLUTION : Joseph McCabe 1.75
IHE RHAlN FHOJI APE lO .MAN :
Frederick Tilney 25.00
EVOLUTION FOR JOHN DOE: Ward.. 3.50
.MV HERESY: Uisliop Wni. M. Brown.. 2.U0
OUTLINE OF MAN'S KNOWLEDGE:
Clement Wood 5.00
SCIENCE VS. DOGMA: C. T. Sprading 1.50
GROWING UP: Karl De Sehweiuitz. . . . 175
HEIK OF ALL THE AGES: McKechnie 3.5U
CRE.VriON UY EVOLUTION: Edited
iiy F'rances .Mason 5 00
LET FREEDO.M RING: Arthur Garfield
Hays 2.50
EXPLORING THE UNIVERSE: Ward.. 3.50
D.\RWIN, THE MAN AND HIS WAR-
FARE: Henshaw Ward 5. 00
WAR ON MODERN SCIENCE: Maynard
Shipley 3.00
C R E A T I O N, NON-EVOLUTIONARY
Tlli;ORIES : Brewster 3.50
THE BIBLE UN.M.\SKED: Joseph Lewis 1.15
CONCERNING .ALAN'S ORIGIN: Sir
Arthur Keith 2.00
ORH.IN OF SPECIES: Darwin 1.00
MANS PLACE IN NATURE: Huxley... 1.00
RIDDLE OF THE UNIVERSE: Haeckcl 2.50
EVOLUTION: Monthly, One Year 1.00
Send postpaid l)v
EVOLUTION. 96 Fifth Avenue. New York.
Pace Fourteen'
EVOLUTION
August, 1929
Desk Room for Rent
Inquire: EVOLUTION, Room
96 Fifth Ave., Watkins 7587.
408.
MT. AIRY
IS A COMMUNITY IN THE MAK-
ING where artists and radicals write
books, teach children, compose music
apd do other worth while things all
the year through. It has a brook,
beautiful woods, many fine views of
the Hudson, running water, electric
light and telephones. It adjoins the
village of Croton-on-Hudson, is one
hour from Grand Central, and has the
best commuting service out of New
York City. Twenty-five houses and
bungalows now on the property and
building going on steadily. Minimum
size plots, !4 acre with improvements.
$600 to $700. Cash or terms.
Inquire Harry Kelly, 104 Fifth Ave..
Tel. Watkins 7581.
A
22-ACRE ESTATE
on the Hudson
with
a 23-room
brick
building. Gar-
age.
With all
modern conveniences. |
Two
hours from
New
Y'ork. Bargain
for q
uick sale.
DR
N. S
H.^NOKA,
65 W.
117th
St., New York.
LITTLE BLUE BOOKS, 5^,
only stock in New York,
575 Pacific Street, Brooklyn.
Back Nos. McCabe's Key to
Culture — and all
Haldeman- Julius Publications.
HALDEMAN-JULIUS STUDY CLUB,
now forming, a general education
along liberal lines. Send name and
address to P. O. Box 899,
City Hall Station, N. Y. City.
THE SCIENTIFIC INSTINCT
guided the making of
THE REES CHARTS
Unique, Ociginal, Masterful.
POCKET SIZE: Each
The Explorer's Sign 25c
The Scientist's Ladder 50c
The Outline of Knowledge 50c
The Chart of the Mind 50c
Wall Size:
Parallel History of America,
England, France and Spain,
from 1480 to 1770 A. D.,
and UnitcdStatcs from 1770
to 1925 1.00
Bible History, according to
The Bible, from 4000 B.
C. to 100 A. D 50c
First Editions just off the press.
FOREST R. REES,
OIL GEOLOGIST,
Box 1594, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
FUNNYMENTALS
When will the world realize that in
evolution it has taken an adder to its
bosom? Will it awake to the truth be-
fore its lifeblood is completely drained
by the serpent it now fondles? — Editorial
in Signs of the Times, March 19, 1929.
We congratulate the people of Ar-
kansas upon what they have accom-
plished for the protection of the faith
and morals of the youth of their state
by decreeing that they shall not be
taught that they are the descendents of
the brutes. And we congratulate theai
because they had the keenness to foresee
the baleful eflfect of the teaching of this
brutal doctrine upon their youth. — Dr.
R. .\. Meek in the Southern Methodist.
They (evolutionists) put everything in
the universe on the basis of natural law,
and inevitably, therefore, the super-
natural phases of Christ and His life —
His deity, His miracles, His incarnation.
His atonement, His bodily resurrection —
must ix discarded by them . . . The re-
jection of the supernatural is a direct
blow to Christianity. All religion is
supernatural . . . But more particularly,
the current movement away from the
supernatural is absolutely fatal to
Christianity. Cliristianity is the most
supernatural of all the reUi/ions of the
v.'orld.~.\. L. Baker and F. D. Nichol.
from book "Creation — Not Evolution,"
pages 119-120.
The One who made the heavens, the
world, and man, was the One who gave
us the Bible. The Maker knows the
thing He has made. There can be no
mistake when He speaks of the laws of
Nature, because He instituted those laws.
God gave us the Bible as a textbook in
salvation, not in astronomy, zoology, or
physiology : but when He sees fit to
cite a fact from these fields, H-e knows
whereof He speaks. The evolutionists
should check up by Him, not He by
theiu ; for as the heavens are higher
than the earth, so are His ways higher
than their ways, and His thoughts than
their thoughts. — Same, p. 152.
Science League of America
For Freedom in Science Teaching
Every sympathizer invited to Join.
Fee: Annual, $3; Lite, $25
Write for pamphlet.
504 Gillette Bldg., San Francisco
American Secular Union
stands for the principles proclaimed in
the Nine Demands for Liberalism or
the complete separation of church and
state. Organized 1876. Incorporated
1900 under the laws of Illinois. A rep-
resentative national organization, man-
aged by a board of directors, elected
by the membership every third year.
Annual membership, $1.00; Life, $10.00
Address all communications to
W. L. MACLASKEY, Secretary,
P. O. Box 1109, Chicago, Illinois.
THE TRUTH SEEKER
National Freethought Weekly
Established 1873
GEORGE E. MAC DONALD. Editor
$5.00 per year
Three months, $1. Foreign, $1.15
49 Vesey Street, New York
I
Catalogue of anti-religious books free
ATHEIST BOOK STORE
119 East 14th St. New York City
I
THE MISSING LINKS
Evolution, Science, Histoid, so fas-
cinating that you will read it again
and again. One college professor said,
*The completeness of the discussion
and logical connections are remark-
J. H. WILLIAMS.
Wilson, Kansas.
able.
Postpaid 35c
Jesus Christ Was an Evolutionist
The Bible teaches this law of nature
very plainly.
The essay that won the Los Angeles
Examiner prize.
Sent for ten cents.
Address: S. J. BROWNSON, M.D.
Soldiers' Home, Sawtelle, Calif.
INTRODUCTION
THE CHURCH OF HUMANITY
is founded organized, incorporated and chartered by the state of Kansas to teach
the discovered truths of nature that there is no real God, tliat man has no soul
and that death ends life mind and consciousness forever.
It is the evolution of "The Church" from a heathenizing institution to a civil-
izing institution, from a teacher of educational insanity to a teacher of educational
sanity, from a teacher of lies on nature to a teacher of nature's truths. Get, read
and study its books advertised below and then send me your church membership
application. The plans are to have a local C. O. H. in every community served
by an instructor on annual salary in time. w. h. KERR. President-Secretery.
CIILRCH OF HUMANITY.
KERR'S DISCOVERIES
That no Real God or Soul Exists Blasts Out the Foundation Pillars of all
Religions in the Mind of Those Who Learn Them
All Gods Dethroned and Man Enthroned as Supreme Being of Earth
The World Harmonizes as all Religions Become Obsolete
Man's Knowledge Extended Beyond the Grave, and What Be-
comes of the Dead Revealed, and the Mystery of the Ages Solved.
THE GOOD-WILL MISSIONARIES TO ALL THE WORLD.
Vol. 1— KERR'S DISCOVERIES \ 50c each
Vol. 2— JESUS ANALYZED ( post paid
Address the Author, Founder and President of The Church of Humanity,
W. H. KERR, 2210 Broadway, Great Bend, Kansas.
THIS AMAZING BOOK
Was $2.50
Now only $1.00
Endors-id by Famous
People
" 'The Bible Unmasked'
is a brilliant and daring
feat of honest scholarship
. . . every thinking man
and woman will appreciate
its great merits."'
—William J. Fielding,
Celebrated Author.
"I have read with sus-
tained enjoyment Joseph
Lewis' book, 'The Bible
Unmasked.'
"If the religionists will
read Mr. Lewis' book, it
will do them good."
—Rev. A. \V. Slaten,
Minister, West Side
Unitarian Church, N. Y.
"Words fail to describe
the extraordinary method
that Joseph Lewis pur-
sues in 'The Bible Un-
masked' to belittle that
work ... he noses out
all the passages concerned
with adultery, incest and
other violent crimes
against accepted morals
and holds them up as
horrible examples of what
the young girl should not
read."
—The New York World.
"If you care to read
about the other side of
the picture, 'The Bible
Unmasked' presents it.
Joseph Lewis has spared
no pains to extract the
UBipleasant scenes from
the Bible and to draw his
conclusions as to its na-
ture and its unfitness as
a book to be allowed in
the hands of children— or
to be passed through the
mails."
— From the Bookman,
New York City.
"The work is a com-
mendable one and a
strong appeal to reason.
An onen mind will be
incited to some lively
thinking by it. . . . I
could easily eet up and
shout for Mr. Lewis
without much effort."
— F-douard Keleieh.
The Yonkers Star.
"I read 'The Bible Un-
masked' through and could
hardly lay it down long
enough to go and eat a
meal."
— E. A. Slater.
Freeport, Mich.
"T h.ive read Joseph
Lewis* book 'The Bible
T'nmasked'. and consider
it the mo-it valuable con-
'ributinn of its kind that
Ins ever been published.
A copy of this book should
he in the hnnds of every
honest, thinkinjr man and
woman in America.
"T wish it might be pos-
sible to compel each of the
t--o hundred and fifteen
thousand clergymen in the
T'nited States to read
every word of it to the
ndnlt men of their consre-
L'ations. Then, as a fur-
ther punishment to the
ministers, they should be
prosecuted for corrupting
the morals nf men by
rending the Bible to them.
"More power to Mr.
Lewis* elbow.'*
-E. S. West,
Lieut. Col. U. S. A.
NOW ONLY $1.00
A CHALLENGE TO THE WORLD
Everybody knows something about the Scriptures. All of us are
vaguely familiar with it. But few really know exactly what it con-
tains. Some people w^ho have "read" the Bible all their lives are
astounded when the real truth is brought to their attention.
Once the Bible was held to be supreme in science, art, philosophy.
Today we no longer accept it for any of these things. In every
field of knowledge which has effected human happiness and prog-
ress, the authority- of the Bible has been rejected.
Today it is still claimed for the Scriptures that they give man
a workable code of morals. But is that true? We know that the
Bible has been prove'd wrong in all of its claims to authority. It
is only natural, then, that even this last shred of authority should
be doubted. And this last claim is torn away from the Bible by
Joseph Lewis, in his astounding book, "The Bible Unmasked." An
eminent writer has declared this book to be "the most daring ex-
posure of modern times, and recalls the satire of Voltaire, the reason
of Paine and the eloquence of Ingersoll." The conclusions of this
indomitably amazing book cannot be avoided. It is a challenge to
the entire world.
Ministers must read it to defend themselves. Religious believers
will be shocked at the revelations of what they have blindly and
obediently accepted as divine truth.
Thinking men and women will be happy to welcome this latest
step of advance thought.
The Coupon Saves You $1,50
MAIL IT TODAY >
So great has been the demand for this book, and
so widespread the controversy occasioned by its
publication, that in this country alone five large
editions have already been sold at the regular price
of $2.50 a copy, but both the author and publisher
want this book to be put into the hands of every
thinkins man and ivoinan in America and are now
offering for only $1.00 a copy plus 15c for packing
and delivery charges.
The present edition is limited to only 10.000 copies.
At this bargain price of only $1.00 a copy the edition
will be gone quickly. "The Bible Unmasked" con-
tains 288 pages, printed on fine antique book paper,
and beautifully bound in dark maroon cloth. Order
it now while we still have the privilege of sending
it to you. Canadian orders will not be accepted, as
this book has been prohibited in Canada. Mail the
coupon at once — and so be sure that you are in time.
Buy several copies and pass them on to those who
need them.
Now only $L00
Was $2.50
Read This
Amazing Table
of Contents
Introduction
Abram and Sarai
"Sporting", or Isaac, and
His Wife Rebekah
Incest, or, Lot and His
Daughters
Jacob, Leah and Rachel
Joseph and Potiphar's
Wife
Judah and His Daughter-
in-law Tamar
The 19th Chapter of
Judges
King David of Israel and
His Wives
The Story of Ruth
King Solomon and His
Songs
The Book of Esther
The New Testament
The Virgin Birth, or
Mary, the Holy Ghost,
Joseph and Jesus
Christ
The Virgin Birth Ac-
cording to St. Luke
Elisabeth, Angel Gabriel
and Zacharias, or the
Seduction of Elisabeth
According to the Gos-
pel of St. Luke
Jesus and The Sinner
Conclusion
The Creed of Science
$1.50 CREDIT COUPON
The Freetliought Press Ass'n,
i2.10 West Mth Street, New York. Ev. 5
I wish to take advantage of your generous
oiTer to secure a copy of Joseph Lewis' daring
book, "The Bible Unmasked." printed on antique
book paper, containing 28S pages, and bound in
maroon cloth, at the special price of only $1.00
plus l.^c for delivery charges.
.Va
.Age.
.\ddress
Tity
State
A special combinatiou offer of Mr. Lewis'
brochures, "Lincoln the Freethinker,"
"Franklin the Freethinker," "Jefferson the
Freethinker,'* together with a copy of Mr. Lewis'
eloquent radio addresses on "Lincoln the
Soldier" and "Gems from Ingersoll" will be sent
for only 50c additional. It wanted put X in
square and add 50c to your remittance.
Check here if you desire book sent C.O.D.
a
n
(When writing to advertisers please mention EVOLUTION.)
QWWARP CHR1511AN\ SOLDI El^^^j
Let your religious friends read
the stenographic record of
The Great Evolution Debate
between
Prof. Jos. McCabe and Rev. W. B. Riley
published complete in three issues of
EVOLUTION.
(Riley refused to publish it in his magazine.)
25c postpaid. To 10 or more addresses, 20c.
EVOLUTION, 96 Fifth Ave., New York, N. Y.
The Proofs of Evolution
by HENSHAW WARD
Appeared originally as series of articles in EVO-
LUTION. Resulting demand necessitated republica-
tion as booklet. Simplest, clearest explanation of the
evidence for evolution, empliasizing its significance
rather tliaii reciting its details.
10c. each, 15 for $1.00, $5.00 per hundred.
Sent postpaid on receipt of price.
EVOLUTION, 96 Fifth Ave., New York, N.Y.
A New Departure
SEVERAL NEW FEATURES will begin in the next issue of
EVOLUTION. A new department, "OBJECTIONS ANSWERED,"
will be written by Edwin Tenney Brewster, author of "Creaf /on;
A History of Non- Evolutionary Theories and of this Puzzling
Planet." Mr. Brewster will conduct a column of rebuttal, disposing
of the claims of fundamentalists one by one. We shall also start
publishing a page of "SCIENCE NEWS, " a "QUESTION BOX"
and a "BIBLIOGRAPHY" of articles appearing in other maga-
zines that should be of interest to evolutionists.
To make room for these new departments we had thought of
increasing the number of pages and the price of EVOLUTION. But
we are convinced that in order for EVOLUTION to fulfill its real
purpose, to reach not merely evolutionists but broad masses of the
people with its message, it is helpful to keep the rate of $1 per year.
So we shall make room for these improvements by leaving out all
commercial advertising beginning with our next issue, and depend on
our friends to send enough additional subscribers to make up for the
loss in advertising revenue.
If you approve of this policy, will you not send in a list of sub-
scriptions? Until October 1st we shall continue our offer of 50c per
year in lists of live or more. After that date the rate will be 60c.
Better make up a list of your friends right away, so that their sub-
scriptions will start with the new features that will begin in our next
HONOR ROLL
liere are the friends whom heat ot summer could not daunt,
little monkey pendant went to each one that sent ten or more.
The
17 L W. Howerth
12 Knute Evertz
12 V.Nesteroff
10 G. Schmemann
10 Frank Hart
10 Wm. G. Schultz
10 J. C. R. Charest
10 G. Obergfell
10 E. Prizer
10 G. F. Marvin
10 Arnold Gross
10 J. M. Kent
10 Frank Childs
10 V. G. Bloede
10 Albert Boehm
10 A. W. Watwood
10 A. Bogard
10 J. N. Chain
10 Wm. DeCoster
Rate: Single, $1 per year; in lists of five or more, 50c
10 Richard White
6 A. L. Goldwater
6 L. King Quan
5 W. C. Kraatz
S Sidney Bailey
5 S. Liberty
5 H. E. Kelsey
5 Frank Solm
5 S. W. Narregang
; (after October 1, 60c).
WRITES wit
ink free and
casyasalead pencil
without a miss, skip
or blur. Won't blot,
scratch, leak or soil
hands. No compli-
cated mechanism to
Ret out of order. High-
est grade materials and
workmanship.
MAKES 3 to 4
CARBON COPIES
With Original In Ink
Patent Automatic 14 kt.
Gold Feed prcvcntsclogging
— steady, uniform flow of ink
actually improves your hand-
writing. Also made in smaller
size with ring on cap for men's
watch chain or ladies' sautoir.
SEND NO MONEY
PayPostmanSl-SOpIuspostageorscnt^
prepaid If remittance accompan
order. Year's guarantee certilicate as-
euresabsolutesatisfaction. Yourmoney
back if not satisfied within ten days.
INKOGRAPH CO., Inc.
19-150 Centre St.. New York ^
Af PMXQ This big value sells on 1
'^^J*-^^ * »-' sight. Big profits, quick "
sales, no investment, immediate commis-
sions. Send for Inkograph and order book
and begin taking orders or write for FREEsale:. plan-
Luaulorii m
MULTIBINOER
Syracuse. N, Y.
Stockton, Calif.
-c*